Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pawn 2.0 #18

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

pawn 2.0 #18

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

ruicoelhopedro
Copy link
Owner

@ruicoelhopedro ruicoelhopedro commented Oct 12, 2023

In this version, several new features have been included.
The evaluation now uses a full NNUE, which has been retrained from new datasets generated throughout. Compared with the previous hybrid classical/NNUE evaluation, the NNUE-only version is also faster.
Support for Syzygy endgame tablebases has been added, using Fathom for the probing code. The behaviour is described in the README.
Some aspects have also been simplified, and some additional Elo gains are expected under SMP conditions.

With these changes, compared to the 1.0 version, the measured Elo gain in self-play is in the order of 230 Elo, and the new version wins around 40 times more game pairs than it loses.

LTC vs pawn 1.0
Games: 2000/2000 Elo diff: 238.66 [226.25, 251.62] (95%)
W: 1245 L: 53 D: 702 Draw ratio: 35.1%
Pntl: [0, 20, 150, 448, 382]

Closes #18

No functional change

In this version, several new features have been included.
The evaluation now uses a full NNUE, which has been retrained from new datasets generated throughout. Compared with the previous hybrid classical/NNUE evaluation, the NNUE-only version is also faster.
Support for Syzygy endgame tablebases has been added, using Fathom for the probing code. The behaviour is described in the README.
Some aspects have also been simplified, and some additional Elo gains are expected under SMP conditions.

With these changes, compared to the 1.0 version, the measured Elo gain in self-play is in the order of 230 Elo, and the new version wins around 40 times more game pairs than it loses.

LTC vs pawn 1.0
Games: 2000/2000 Elo diff: 238.66 [226.25, 251.62] (95%)
W: 1245 L: 53 D: 702 Draw ratio: 35.1%
Pntl: [0, 20, 150, 448, 382]

No functional change
@ruicoelhopedro ruicoelhopedro merged commit c6da0bf into main Oct 12, 2023
@ruicoelhopedro ruicoelhopedro deleted the v2 branch October 12, 2023 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant